this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
1044 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60382 readers
341 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nakal@kbin.social 193 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Programs are mathematical proofs. If maths cannot be patented, software can't be, either.

[–] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Proofs can be represented as programs, not the other way around. Also, USA allows for algorithm parents, and algorithms are maths. While I agree with you, your reasoning is not correct.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, the proof - program correspondence is in both directions.

[–] GeniusIsme@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Correspondence is quite a weak relation. Very far from one being another.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I'd say if you ask a mathematician, they would disagree with you. But maybe that depends on how far they have gone into maths from common sense

Correspondence is not correlation.

[–] nakal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That's why it's also called Curry-Howard isomorphism.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Judges and Justices are not that precise. They aim to preserved public order before anything else. If a whole industry is based on a questionable interpretation of patent, they is a lot of chances that judges would agree on it. Even in countries where you could not patent algorythm, industries patent the documentation, the "software design", the brand name, the illustrations used, and aggregates everything together, to say they own it. And it works.

TL;DR : Class Justice