this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
651 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5995 readers
870 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _danny@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's also a weight thing. Tampons are pretty light, it's like one hundred per pound, so they probably said "we can budget x pounds for this" and didn't think much about the reasoning behind why they're sending several hundred tampons into space, but we're entirely focused on how.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 19 points 1 year ago

Less than that I think, and I’d suspect NASA would do load calculations in metric.

According to this reputable (first result on Google) High School Science Fair Project ^PDF, the average tampon is about 1g. I wouldn’t be surprised if they just budgeted 100g for it.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

There's also the point that they don't go bad. It might be easier to send a load up now, that try and fit enough for each female astronaut into every flight.