this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Science
6 readers
1 users here now
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The blue glow, Cherenkov radiation, is something that happens underwater, though. It's not really a drop-in replacement for, say, a puddle of radioactive waste.
I think that the problem is more that artists just want a way to indicate that something is radioactive, but we can't see radioactivity, so they had to seize on some sort of convention that deviated from the real world. It doesn't really need to reflect reality to work, just as long as the convention holds. And the practice of doing that in art isn't that new, either -- think of the halo, which serves a similar purpose:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_%28religious_iconography%29