this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
337 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

72729 readers
1587 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
337
Scientists confirm that the first black hole ever imaged is actually spinning (www.engadget.com)
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Scientists confirm that the first black hole ever imaged is actually spinning::The first black hole humanity has ever imaged has also provided us with what researchers are calling "unequivocal evidence" that black holes spin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess the next questions would be

  1. How fast? Really fast? Does this question even make sense?
  2. What does this say about the inside of the event horizon? Does it say anything? Is this black hole leaking real information?
  3. Is black hole spin quantized like quantum spin? Is it spin-up or spin-down?
[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Quantum Physics “spin” has nothing to do with actual spinning. It’s just a weirdly named property of particles.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've always thought that they should have just named the properties something like P1, P2, etc. So there's no connotation.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought "spinning" was meant rather literally in this case and not in some quantum sense

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

For black holes, it does refer to actual spinning. Particles are the ones not really spinning.