this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
95 points (99.0% liked)

news

23804 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

run from it, dread it, beans arrive all the same

bean bean-think chickpea

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kristina@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I have actually discussed this paper at length before on this site, but I think I'll go for the simple punch. Wood was the director for Pfizer in their Animal Health division, which supplies the American meat industry with antibiotics and is actively creating a major crisis for global health (antibiotic resistant bacteria) for the sake of profit. Perhaps that is why he likes writing negatively about something that could slash his bottom line thinking-about-it

And being the director for a division this big and important in a pharma company means you are, very strictly, a shithead ghoul. If you look into him further, he has significant investments in anything beef-farming related.

http://lifesciencessummit.co.nz/speaker/paul-wood-ao/ more info on this guy, who is a literal ghoul

[–] cynesthesia@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This argument isn't convincing. By that guy's own bio, he supports the CSIRO protein mission in Australia. Read the bio you linked and follow up - there are a whole bunch of non beef, non conventional proteins listed in his resume.

Anyway, the whole problem with lab grown meat from a chemical engineering perspective is that it has to be grown under clean room conditions like a pharmaceutical. Companies and people with pharmaceutical experience, precursor products, bioreactors would all benefit from lab grown meat taking off.

Find a bean salesman that is worried about the advent of lab meat and I'll buy this line of argument. If you've discussed the substance of that article elsewhere please link.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The team used the emerging ‘net protein contribution’ concept to measure the quality and quantity of protein created by cattle compared to the protein they eat, looking at both grain-fed cattle and grass-fed cattle that may eat small amounts of grain.

They found typical Australian grain-fed beef production systems contribute almost twice the human- edible protein they consume, while grass-fed systems produce almost 1600 times.

It means the beef sector now has benchmark figures for the protein it contributes to the food supply, which will help track improvements and compare efficiency to other protein production systems when they are assessed using the method.

Red meat is often criticised as having a very large footprint, taking up land that could be used to grow crops for human food, or eating grain that humans could be eating instead, otherwise known as the ‘feed versus food debate’.

However, CSIRO livestock systems scientist Dr Dean Thomas said Australian beef production is efficient at converting both low quality protein in grains that humans can eat, as well as protein in grass that humans can’t eat, into high quality protein for human nutrition.

“Cattle are efficient upcyclers of grass and other feedstuffs not just in terms of the quality of protein they create. They contribute a greater amount of protein to our food system than is used in their production as well,” Dr Thomas said.

re: supporting beef farming

https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/News/2021/December/CSIRO-sets-beef-benchmark-for-protein-production

https://www.csiro.au/en/work-with-us/services/consultancy-strategic-advice-services/CSIRO-futures/Agriculture-and-Food/Australias-Protein-Roadmap

their own roadmap even has a disproportionate increase in meat production, and much of their plant based funding is going straight into the mouths of that cattle

if you want to read my previous posts, you can search it, im not going to research everything for you.

[–] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes he is a shithead ghoul. But the people financing cultivated meat are also ghouls (effective altruists). I would also agree with what he's saying here, having worked in a cultivatedeat company. The problem is we're trying to grow single cells that don't want to grow by themselves. They have no immune system, and no hormone production. So you have to supply those things exogenously, and run it in a sterile process. The Humbird report mentioned in the article on The Counter linked above does a good job of explaining it, I also tried to explain it in my own article, which is a top level comment.

[–] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

More than 90% of the funding for lab grown meat comes from China not effective altruists. Similar to green energy, the effective altruists are just following in the wake of China

[–] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 4 points 1 year ago

I apologize, I was not actually aware of China's research into CM, my viewpoint thus far was mainly constrained to a western one.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the people financing cultivated meat are also ghouls

And the Communist Party of China thinking-about-it

[–] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I apologize, I was not actually aware of China's research into CM, my viewpoint thus far was mainly constrained to a western one.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah you can get a relatively small plate of cultivated chicken in hong kong/shenzhen area for 15-25 usd.

[–] Farman@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Even when you have single cells that want to grow by themselves like yeast its very hard to mantain a sterile process. Thats why lager became the most common beer type. It alows you to run bio reactors at very cold temperatures to give the desired yeast time to outcompete the others. And thus you need to spend less efort mantaining a sterile situation.

I cant imagine how hard is to mantain a sterile enviorment with meat cells.