this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
51 points (88.1% liked)

Asklemmy

45278 readers
1155 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was going through the modlog today and found that this comment posted to lemmy.ml was simply removed for being "reactionary".

Removed Comment What reform of France's educational establishment would satisfy you? Should they move their weekends to Mondays and Tuesdays in order to avoid accidentally aligning with any religious practice's day of rest? This is a ridiculous standard to hold any societal institution to. Because France's dominant culture has been Christian for many years, its secular institutions of course have echoes of Christian practice within them - but this is not proof that they are Christian institutions. Education is good. Education should be given to every single person in society, and every person in it should have a right to receive a full secular education regardless of their parents' opinion on the matter. And during the course of that education, class, ethnic, and religious differences between children should be minimized in order to socialize children into being tolerant, metropolitan citizens. reason: reactionary

That sounds like a perfectly respectable position to have, even if it may be a little controversial, but it is more constructive than divisive. I really like lemmy's transparency in showing what was removed and why, but for the first time I'm seeing what looks like a summary removal of an urbane comment.

Am I the only one who is worried by that? Am I missing something here?

By the way, I'm not interested in debating the subject, there is plenty of debate in the original post, what I want to know is how any of you would frame this as decisively reactionary enough to throw out of a healthy debate when comparing with the flood of shitposting we see every day that doesn't get struck down.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do you do if you see a perfectly reasonable comment in the modlog?

Start your own instance?

Am I missing something here?

By the way, Iโ€™m not interested in debating the subject

Well now which is it?

[โ€“] Gsus4 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I want to know what reactionary stands for when summarily dismissing a comment like that. At least looking at a dictionary this is not a reactionary comment, particularly in the context of such a debate.

Also starting my own instance would not help anyway, because the comment was removed from a discussion in another instance from mine, right? Any conversation started in an instance is completely at the unappealable mercy of that instance's moderators.

[โ€“] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how to do that while also not discussing the issue at hand.

[โ€“] Gsus4 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What is a reactionary, according to you? (if you agree with the decision)

Also: am I crazy for not thinking this is a reactionary comment that deserves to be removed in a public debate while e.g. "death to america" is still there? I won't argue back, I just want to hear if I'm the minority here.