this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
55 points (96.6% liked)

Australia

4450 readers
216 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A specific road use tax on EVs and hybrids makes no sense.

Given the harms caused by traditional vehicles, society should welcome the decline in fuel excise revenue caused by the transition to EVs – in the same way we should welcome declining revenue from cigarette taxes.

Vehicle registration fees make only a modest contribution to road costs. That’s why all motorists should pay a road-user charge. The payment should be based on a combination of vehicle mass and distance travelled

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That make sense.

Also, an hybrid vehicle may pollute more if it's never recharged and only use gas. Or less if it's frequently recharged.

So an added benefit of that change would be to get rid of an automatic insentive for hybrid. Taxing gas and fossil fuel is a more direct and efficient insentive. If gas cost more, hybrid owners will recharge more often.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuel excise makes sense, the more fuel you use the more you've probably driven, the more damage you've contributed to the road. How to make it fair for EV users with out invading individual privacy is harder. Like what should a commuter pay compared to a courier who would do far more kms and relies on the road for the business?

It's going to be unpopular, but as a car lover, I'm happy to pay a carbon tax to keep driving gas guzzlers and have that reinvested into carbon neutrality, whether that's EV subsidies or something else work a better carbon return

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If a commuter and or courrier drive the same distance on the same road with a similar car, they should contribute the same road toll for maintenance.

A courier should be able to deduct the toll from his income, counting it as a business expense. So it's a bit less of a burden for profesionnals who depend on their vehicle.

There already are mechanisms for this. No need to complicate further.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

How do you calculate the road toll?

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The article has some suggestions

The payment should be based on a combination of vehicle mass and distance travelled. That’s because damage to roads is overwhelmingly caused by heavy vehicles.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

My biggest problem with that is the distance; either the licencing authority has access to our cars position or we self report it. Neither are great options in my opinion

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Have you heard of toolbooths?

There are variations that require neither self reporting nor tracking cars. Grab a ticket uppon entering the highway. Feed the ticket in the exit booth and pay with cash or credit card. The machine uses the ticket to compute the distance.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well yeah, but most of my driving is around the suburbs or the small country roads near my house, no complaints I guess, but i wouldn't be paying my fair share of road use.

Plus to cover the full road network seems like a huge expense. I mean you could fund it using a carbon tax, but I feel like paying for tollboths is not good bang for buck in carbon abatement

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 1 points 11 hours ago

I'm unaware of any country that setup a road toll infrastructure on small road, tollbooth or otherwise.

This is only for highways and major roads.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

It could be reported each time the car is serviced or at registration time. Seems to happen in the US like that sometimes.

If people misreport it, it would be caught when they try to sell the vehicle. Eg, if I report 5K per year, but actually do 20K, then if I try to sell it in 5 years time, and it shows 25K on the Registration info, but 100K on the odo, then I'm not buying that car lol

But, of course, they'll go for the "track your car at all times" option. An app that you must operate and sends real time GPS info would be their wet dream. Or they could just take the Maps data you send directly from Apple and Google lol

As an aside, insurance companies would love this too. You were speeding by 3km/h? Your insurance premium has just jumped by 20%.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 2 points 17 hours ago

Good point, I hadn't thought of a car rego declaration. Servicing seems like not the best idea as it would make life harder for poor people, who might stretch out servicing and would probably do it more if there was an additional cost at that point.

I'm scared that continually tracking your car will be the default option though. Best argument against it is to argue that it would put victims of domestic violence at further risk