this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
86 points (88.4% liked)

Out of the loop

13362 readers
76 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The preceding Runic thorn was ᚦ. While similar to the Latin character Þ/þ, it makes sense to classify one as a rune (since it fits with other runes, which all have constant height) and the other as a letter (since they exist as uppercase and lowercase).

Similarly, the characters 칭 or 🐝 are not letters but a Hangul syllable and emoji, respectively.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Interesting! I always thought a letter was a thing that mapped to a sound. So obviously not Chinese characters. But the thorn as the th sound would qualify.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nope. Phonemes or their groups, most commonly represented by IPA characters, map to a sound. If you know anything about English spelling, you'll know that letters and sounds don't correspond in many cases.

However, you are right that "letter" can be used for any segmental (phoneme-based) writing system, including runic (examples)