this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
39950 readers
175 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Almost certainly as much as regenerative breaking on an EV, so upwards of 90%. Like you mentioned, it's the same thing in another shape.
A high speed train probably doesn't break all that much, though, and I'm guessing wind resistance is the biggest energy cost either way. Which is why people talk about putting a maglev in an evacuated tunnel, although you now have an oversize oil pipeline around your maglev tracks adding further to the cost.
It's true. You can make a pretty cheap magnet, but never as cheap as a couple stupid rods on the ground (although at high speeds I bet it's not just rods but ultra-precise rods). Some systems put the magnets just in the car instead, though, and usually with high-speed rail acquiring a continuous corridor of land to build is the big hurdle, so it might make sense to go as high-end as possible once you have it.