this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)
Space
1669 readers
10 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instanceโs local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
๐ญ Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
๐ Engineering
๐ Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"We'll just dodge stuff forever!" - Humanity's plan on dealing with exponentially increasing space junk.
"We'll deploy satellite constellations of thousands to tens of thousands so people can talk on their cellphones in the middle of the ocean" - Humanity's plan on reducing satellites in orbit, which is the major cause of space junk.
As long as the constellations aren't deployed above ~600 km (*glares at Guowang*), they shouldn't pose a long-term debris risk.
You're not wrong, but many of the satellites are dual use and would be up for the military anyways, because not having them or not having access to them means being vulnerable.
I think cleaning space junk up is more viable than finally achieving a stable world peace, as humans historically never had a single day without an overlapping armed conflict in > 6000 years. It's sad, but war is kinda our thing.