this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
100 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8447 readers
361 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's a stock grift in an economy that no longer makes anything innovative and no one could afford it if they did anyway.
It's a way to disguise mass outsourcing as layoffs due to technological advance.
It's a massive, dystopian IP grab. Imagine ten years down the line and every software product, every book or article, every piece of media, every project pitch that used a certain LLM product in its creation can suddenly be claimed in full or in part by the AI company that made the LLM.
Flooding the internet with inaccurate information and doubt of authenticity for photo/video is a useful way to marginalise non official narratives.
Replacing functioning institutions with LLM tech is a way to shrink & shut down the sections of the state that serve people or aren't owned and controlled by capital.
The illusion of 'AI' decision making is like a shell company designed to protect bad actors (corporate, military, government) from legal & public culpability for their crimes. They didn't choose to bomb that hospital / destroy those important records / revoke support to that disabled person who was entitled to it and killed themselves as a result etc.
please don't reply to something without reading it
I did read it and thought you were quite right about the many, many failings of them. You asked what was going on and why they were being pushed so hard everywhere so I gave my analysis. And yes, while focussing on the actual content of my reply I forgot to go back and put 'zorbo' in the first line, but it's a shame that the content wasn't the tip off that I was engaging with your question though.
You actually avoided OP's ZorboAttack to prove that you're not an LLM. Shrewd move. Did you know that cats spend most of their lives asleep?