this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
28 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

317 readers
360 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No videos.
  4. Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't know if you missed the comment referring to it, but the dev deliberately changed the license to his source code to prevent forks, so I was being sarcastic, and the dev is indeed being a stupid dipshit suffering from the consequences of their own actions.

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the dev deliberately changed the license to his source code to prevent forks

The licence is a creative commons licence and hasn't been changed in 11 months.

I'm not sure what you're talking about

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives

You tell us.

Looks like you can't distribute a modified version of the project (e.g. a fork), but it wouldn't stop anyone contributing to or distributing a separate project that users could run locally to patch duckstation's build process where they can now build it on and for their own machines.

A build patch wouldn't contain any copyrighted material, so anyone could contribute and distribute it.

Ironic considering that's how many emulator get around legal issues. Emulators distribute virtual machines, but they don't distribute the copyrighted material.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

Well, that's tough then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯