this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
72 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

49785 readers
617 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Communism is the logical progression of society. It isn't a certainty, but the alternative in the long-run is disaster and barbarism.

[โ€“] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but there's a lot of side paths to Communism that have resulted in genocide and environmental destruction. People need to be more skeptical of the flag bearers of Communism rather then treating it like a sport were they pick a side.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

The vast majority of Marxist-Leninists don't treat it as a sport where we pick a side. MLs are fully capable of recognizing progressive movements like Cuba, the USSR, and PRC, and recognizing faux-communism a la the Gonzaloite terrorists of the Shining Path in Peru or Pol Pot the mass murderer. These latter two were not successful applications of Marxism, but deviations far beyond the norm.

Communism remains to be the logical progression of society. As production continues to centralize and class struggle heightens, the more necessary revolution and sublimating property into collective ownership and a common plan becomes. It's as much economically compelled as it is morally. The alternative, again, is barbarism as capitalism crumbles under its own unsustainability.