this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
67 points (98.6% liked)

canada

4919 readers
30 users here now

Canada is not the US's hat. The US is Canada's pants.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

c o o k e d

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] ethan_passerine@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Putin is a reactionary autocrat who embodies the worst traits of State tyranny - nationalistic, militaristic, and hostile towards personal and workplace freedom - even if his oligarchic capitalism and Soviet nostalgia contradict a strict 'far-right' label.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

autocrat

"Putin has absolute personal power" and other lines favored by Anne Applebaum

[–] ethan_passerine@hexbear.net -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why yes, Putin is an autocrat, his highly personalized and centralized system of power lacks meaningful checks and balances. He suppresses dissent, and operates largely on his personal whims rather than any sort of institutional governance.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

seems like this is so subjective it can be applied to any government you don't like. I don't think you have any real evidence for it all being his personal whims beyond Applebaum-tier articles in The Atlantic. on a larger level, this is Great Man Theory bullshit with zero material analysis

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

My cat is autocratic when he decides that dinner time should be at 5 instead of 6.

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is he the shaytan al akbar however? Perhaps he's a shaytan al saghir, tho.

[–] ethan_passerine@hexbear.net 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Opposing one tyranny by excusing another betrays the essence of liberation - solidarity fights all oppression, not just the West's. Revolutionary ethics demand consistency, selective outrage that shields authoritarianism under the guise of anti-imperialism is not how we should conduct ourselves.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

authoritarianism

gotta be my favorite way to dismiss any use of state power I don't agree with

[–] ethan_passerine@hexbear.net 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Russia is deeply authoritarian, and built on the oppression of the people by the State and capital. What would you consider authoritarianism to be?

[–] miz@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so authoritarian is when capitalist state? that doesn't seem like a useful definition to me

[–] ethan_passerine@hexbear.net -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sorry that you find the word 'authoritarian' upsetting, however it does have a commonly agreed upon definition. I personally see no need to pretend otherwise.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ethan_passerine@hexbear.net -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Whether you go by Juan Linz's definition - the origin of the term as used in a political sense - or Bob Altemeyer's later refinement it's clear that Russia fits this label as it was laid out by its originators.

So no, I do not use terminology on the basis of my personal likes or dislikes. I use these terms because they mean something, as laid out by the political theorists who originated them.

So again, I apologize that some words may make you feel itchy, or maybe a little self-conscious. Through, you should note that self-reflection is good, and you shouldn't shun perceivably negative terms because they may (or may not) play into your belief system.

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A word has a meaning of how its used. Its used as "a country liberals (white supremacists) don't like" (because it doesn't let its citizens get genocided by the west).

Also Putin is white

[–] yourebrainwashed@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Putin is allied with netanyahu. Are ALL lemmists dumb?

[–] ethan_passerine@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Hey, I'm not! It's amusing that authoritarian socialists get accused of excusing authoritarianism under the guise of anti-imperialism, while failing to address the reactionary nature of regimes like Putin's though indeed. Especially to the point of proudly exclaiming that the term 'authoritarianism' has no value in theory or praxis - a dead give away to their true nature, and oddly incapable of owning such a label.

What would you consider authoritarianism to be?

A meaningless, inconsistently applied word born out of a fetish for idealism that is primarily used to deem any state opposed to Western hegemony as irredeemable and worthy of condemnation.

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Authoritarianism is when sovereign and not ruled by westerners (according to the way imperialists use the word)

Its a good thing (for us, not for you)

[–] yourebrainwashed@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Russia is literally ruled by westerners. Both in a colonial sense (Siberia is a colony), political (they're an oligarchy) and in the geopolitical one.

If their oligarchs don't create wars how else is Lockheed Martin supposed to sell missile?

Putin is literally the tsar.

Russia is definitely ruled by westerner lmao.

The weapon industry need enemies. Ever heard of the 90ies when America coup'ed russia and they starved for 10 years

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago

"Authoritarianism bad"

Imperialist detected. Are the pesky authoritarians putting up resistance to your world genocide again, instead of rolling over like you want them to?

[–] IsThisLoss@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/ch06.htm

The same must be said of the revolutionary character of national movements in general. The unquestionably revolutionary character of the vast majority of national movements is as relative and peculiar as is the possible revolutionary character of certain particular national movements. The revolutionary character of a national movement under the conditions of imperialist oppression does not necessarily presuppose the existence of proletarian elements in the movement, the existence of a revolutionary or a republican programme of the movement, the existence of a democratic basis of the movement. The struggle that the Emir of Afghanistan is waging for the independence of Afghanistan is objectively a revolutionary struggle, despite the monarchist views of the Emir and his associates, for it weakens, disintegrates and undermines imperialism; whereas the struggle waged by such "desperate" democrats and "Socialists," "revolutionaries" and republicans as, for example, Kerensky and Tsereteli, Renaudel and Scheidemann, Chernov and Dan, Henderson and Clynes, during the imperialist war was a reactionary struggle, for its results was the embellishment, the strengthening, the victory, of imperialism.

[–] yourebrainwashed@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Putin is allied with netanyahu

[–] MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] yourebrainwashed@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyway i hope you're loved ones are ok friend. Free palestine