this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
632 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

73232 readers
4142 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] parpol@programming.dev 130 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just pointing out the obvious here, but the problem isn't organizations like Collective Shout. And there has been a rather worrying development of this issue where people seem to focus on these organizations rather than the actual problem.

Payment processing is a utility. Credit card companies should not be allowed to pick and choose who they allow and who they block. That's the job of the government. Anything illegal can be blocked, but blocking anything legal such as the delisted games, or the Japanese manga sites that visa and MasterCard killed, should count as discriminatory practice and antitrust violation.

Japan is on track to force credit card companies to allow all legal transactions indiscriminately, and we need the same thing to happen in the EU and US. Once we have this fixed, organizations will be forced to instead try to outlaw the games, which is a million times harder.

If we bully organizations like collective shout out of existence, new ones will pop up to take its place, and the cycle repeats, but if we regulate credit card companies, we essentially cure the disease.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Actually insane to say that Collective Shout is blameless. Go look at the vile shit their members are spewing. Not only are they demonstrably culpable for this, they're also engaging in hate speech and disinformation and targeted harassment.

The payment situation is also to blame.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

No one is saying they are blameless. We are saying they are not the issue that we need to focus on fixing here.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Actually insane to say that Collective Shout is blameless

Nobody said that. Except you, I guess.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

They didn't say blameless, but they did heavily imply Collective Shout isn't a problem and that people are worried about the wrong thing. I think Noxy's interpretation and response that there's multiple things to blame was pretty reasonable.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago

to say that Collective Shout is blameless

Twitter is not, as it turns out, the only place where well articulated sentences get misinterpreted.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I love the mental gymnastics of saying that you’re a feminist and also anti-abortion. The only way a woman gets pregnant is from sperm. And in 99% of cases, that was through the interaction with a man. And it may have not been consensual.

But either way, now said woman is bound to modify her body and life because of her interaction with a man, rather than being able to make her own choice, because you said so and you know what’s best for her. She’s “empowered” to be a good little breeder and produce either men or other breeders because apparently that’s what women are good for when you take away their autonomy, which is really what these groups want. Which, is also a big reason why they hate trans women. Trans women cannot do the only job a woman should have, which is to produce offspring.

They would build such an amazing society! With so many empowered women! Freed from the shackles of being able to think or decide for themselves, ready to fulfill their ultimate dream of producing offspring, taking care of offspring, and then dying.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

its why they are called radical feminists

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Except

Radical feminism** is a perspective within feminism that calls for a radical re-ordering of society in which male supremacy is eliminated in all social and economic contexts

But by making sure that women carry children to term whether or not they want to, it’s basically male run, they haven’t said anything about male/female equality.

It’s not the right terminology. Radical feminism has its own flaws, but this is Christian fundamentalism, nothing more, no matter how they label it.