this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
151 points (86.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8279 readers
587 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doom@ttrpg.network -2 points 1 day ago

Except in your analogy there are no women or children or noncombatants. So you think it makes sense. But it's more like if you had an army of knights vs an army of peasants but both armies had babies tied to them and your goal is to stop the baby killing.

Removing armor does nothing.

The casualty ratio is because it's specifically not a war. Israel claiming it is a war is part of their push. I know you know that though.

So why didn't MTG try to pass legislation to remove that fleet? Because that wasn't her goal. Instead she managed to sow more division and get nothing done while stroking you all and making you feel justified and giving you a place to put your anger.