this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
189 points (98.0% liked)
Gaming
5450 readers
438 users here now
!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.
Our Rules:
1. Keep it civil.
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.
2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.
I should not need to explain this one.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.
Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Logo uses joystick by liftarn
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The rabbit hole actually goes deeper.
https://bsky.app/profile/bigginbear.bsky.social/post/3lubibyz6r22r
Apparently the people doing this type of pressuring on the credit card companies are anti-furries, TERFs, and other right-wing anti-porn think tanks, with a possible goal to erase all queer or pornographic content off the internet.
Weird fucks, uncomfortable in their own skin so now they can't handle others just living their life their way
They are uncomfortable in their own skin, so they are mad at other people who, (also uncomfortable) choose to download another skin
This is the only way they can stop themselves from buying the games.
And that's why I fight for this sort of content despite personally finding it disgusting.
Yeah, as much as I absolutely hate people who draw/write incest and pedophilia on a fetishistic manner I know it's just the first step to banning any other type of porn.
Those people should probably tag their shit, tho. Furries who are into incest are extremely bad about this.
how does one “pressure” credit card companies to that extent?
also just because a group claims responsibility doesn’t mean they actually had anything to do with it.
Lobbying, I'd imagine.
Shareholders can vote on the executive positions so they pressure the CEO to do what they want.