this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
1044 points (98.3% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
1976 readers
72 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
no, your debts stay through a personal bankruptcy. this is different.
with a strike system, you're good until you're not. a score system means you can be rejected from some places and accepted at others, giving scummy lenders an in.
also, there's none of that "your score is low because you have nothing to pay off" nonsense.
No, the whole point of bankruptcy is that your debts are cancelled.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bankruptcy.asp
How is that better?
And that's worse than being universally rejected? In reality, if you're completely shut off from credit, it will just encourage illegal loans from loansharks, etc.
You don't have a history of dealing with debt, so they don't assign you the ultra-safe score. If another place doesn't have that, they'll simply have to charge a higher rate to everybody because they can't tell who is going to be good at handling debt and who isn't.
no:
the answer was literally the sentence after the one you quoted.
yes:
No, it claimed without evidence that somehow a strike system prevented "scummy lenders", whereas the reality is that it would result in the scummiest lenders of all, loansharks.
and yet it does not.
what?
it would, and has not, resulted in significant proliferation of loan sharks. we hear far more about those from the us than locally.
Ah, so that's the only difference between the countries?