this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)
Comradeship // Freechat
2454 readers
99 users here now
Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.
A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And in great mockery, after months of getting bombed by Israel and accepting them as an ally they can't refuse, they do this ethnic cleansing under the name of fighting Israel.
Druze were already brutalized by the "moderate rebels" during the first trump presidency. Syrians nowadays think they can carve out a window in their prison cell, like many others in the region.
In the end the political islam and anti-communist baathism, both failed the arab peoples, as any peoples will be failed by the ideologies opposed to communism.
The Ba'ath did not exactly fail the people, it just lost (similar to how soviet union just "lost"). We could argue that Bashar himself failed Syrians, especially in the 2019-2025 period. But by then, he was as far from Ba'ath as was Gorbachev from Communist party.
To add, in mid 20th century, communist parties in Syria and much of the Arab world were unconditional followers of USSR and influential foreign communist parties, even in matters that like the early support of Israel, or the French communist party supporting the french occupation of Syria. The Ba'ath party emerged instead as an Arab implementation of socialism, where Arab liberation was centered, and dependence or blind following of foreign bodies was rejected. It was only opposed to Communism in that sense. If you look at the Ba'ath congress of 1966, you'll see it was even more revolutionary than the communists.
I never really thought that Baathism, at least in Syria, was opposed to Communism.
However, I think the reason the Baathist gov't failed had a lot to do with sectarianism (Alawite minority rule) and neoliberalization (Bashar Al Assad was trying to pull off a Gorbachev or Yeltsin), which is typical to the fledgling national capitalist class, once the national liberation movement is done, and all is left to do is create a typical bourgeois state, with Global South characteristics.
That doesn't mean the sanctions and war didn't have an effect, but it did accelerate those contradictions