this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
160 points (99.4% liked)

PC Gaming

11837 readers
498 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Par for the course after a release at many studios. The positions needed at various steps of production vary. Unless the studio is big enough to be working multiple projects simultaneously and can shift staff around to various teams, hiring and firing for each phase of production is normal.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being "normal" doesn't make it okay.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I never said it did, but at the same time the fact is that those people probably aren't needed anymore. And they may not be for a year or more for another project. That's the nature of development like this. A lot of game development is very specific and people are hired for that specific need. Unless the studio is large enough to be handling multiple projects in various stages of development, keeping all those developers on staff that have no work to do for months or years after release doesn't make sense.

Just pointing out that it shouldn't be taken by anyone as an indictment of the game or development team, how it was received, or necessarily any future plans. It's par for the course.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you want to employ staff that way go for freelance with a fixed duration contract and an increase wages to reflect the temporary nature of the work. This is how it works in the rest of IT, at least anywhere sane.

[–] chickenf622@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah knowing when you're going to be out of a job years in advanced would be so much better than this. You can at least plan around it if you know for sure this job is temporary.

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

It shouldn't be. It's an unsustainable and fucked up way to run a business.