this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
271 points (97.9% liked)
Casual UK
3135 readers
341 users here now
Casual UK
A casual place for banter and anything that doesn't fit in anywhere else.
Have chat and a natter. Talk about anything and everything that's not political!
Keep it casual.
Rules
- No politics.
- Be friendly.
- Be kind & civil.
- No Generative AI Content
- Follow Feddit.uk site rules.
Other communities:
Here:
Elsewhere:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I am going to assume you're autistic since you've clearly given this a lot of thought, yet lack understanding.
Evolution doesn't have a goal or plan at all. We humans have evolved with the necessary traits to live in, every environment we currently live in. You want to argue that our ability to warm ourselves with clothing and cook our food doesn't count? Do you hold other animals, like for example ants to the same standard? Their ability to build and cooperative, like us humans, is the reason they're some of the most successful species on the planet. But you want to judge ants by a single ant on its own?
I am well versed in the subjects you linked. I just believe you've gotten a weird idea in your head about where humans are "meant to live".
Could you point me to where you picked up these ideas? I'd like to be aware if there's some new global warming acceleration movement going on, which I'm assuming you're promoting.
I was responding to your claim that I was misunderstanding the effect of humidity on air temperature.
Hence y'know - all the stuff about humidity and air temperature? The stuff I posted that you're allegedly "well-versed" on?
Judging Ants? Evolution? Did you reply to the wrong thread or are you just spamming random nonsense? And why are you talking like a 14 year old? And what is with all that ableist shit about autistic people? Is it meant to be insulting?
Edit: Now that I think about it, that insult doesn't even make any sense - autistic people usually are known for having a special interest and lots of specific knowledge in an obscure subject.
The "autism" as-internet-insult that I think you're using is meant to imply someone is out of touch or too deep in the weeds wrt some overly nerdy topic like ricing window managers in Linux or something.
I definitely don't know much about the topic at all nor have I thought about this for very long, this isn't my specialty, nor do I claim to be "well-versed in all these subjects" which I'm not sure is even actually possible as they're separate areas of study - but if I were, I would not use it as a source of authority, I just have the basic research skills needed to cite established and well-regarded sources to back up the specific claims I made.
If you'd like to prove something in a debate or make a point in a discussion or establish a claim as valid - you should probably do so by doing the same, not simply claiming to be an authority and then going on some rant about ants and autism.
Blocked.
Do you not remember what you wrote a couple of comments ago? This tirade about windspeed and humidity is irrelevant to the conversation. Humans are excellent at adapting to different climates. You can't simply say "oh humans can't live in the cold" because we definitively can.