this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
34 points (88.6% liked)

Degrowth

1412 readers
1 users here now

Discussions about degrowth and all sorts of related topics. This includes UBI, economic democracy, the economics of green technologies, enviromental legislation and many more intressting economic topics.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] millie@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Oh no, not a better job market, more available housing, and less pollution! What a catastrophy!

Flippancy aside, of course birth rates are declining. Of course constant expansion isn't sustainable. The systemic gluttony of capitalism literally cannot go on forever, and the faster we slow it down the better. It's a cancer on our species and our planet. If we want to continue to exist in any capacity we need to get it under control, and that's going to require reconsidering things like constant market growth and never letting the population fall.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

But thibk about the glass full of water, becausr there was noboty to give it to you!

[–] dumples@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are two ways for species to reduce their population. They way it happens for everything that cannot control their own birth rates (i.e. everything except us) it a catastrophic death rate increases via disease, predication or hunger. We control our birth rate to have get to a sustainable levels. Seems cruel to go the other way

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

"Cruel, why would it be any better?" Oligarchs and their misinformed masses.