104
“Astounding” Results: Blocking One Enzyme Brings Parkinson’s-Damaged Cells Back to Life
(scitechdaily.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
104 points (100.0% liked)
Public Health
880 readers
50 users here now
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (📍)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have nothing against mice, but I don't think I'd want my brain to function like theirs.
Here's the thing: it does already. That's why mice are great early research animals.
"Close enough" is not close enough.
No reason to think that Parkinson's would be any different.
snicker you're citing incorrect data. You should be looking at how many wind up working in people that dont work in mice to make the argument you're trying to make.
You're also ignoring things that we outright reject because the side effects on mice are horrific.
And finally way to cherry pick your dataset.
Humans have no right to experiment on other living beings.
Also this, but I thought it went without saying.
Unfortunately carnists are still experimenting on animals.
Descartes should have just said "cogito ergo sum" and published his coordinate system and quit while he was ahead.
congrats on having most unrelated comment of the day. in no way was i taking a position on the morality of animal testing. just the technical aspect of the current methods being used.
you'll note that their little quoted pamplet isnt talking about the morality of the use just making the completely incorrect claims that the animal models are useless. which is just plain incorrect.
until we figure out how to create synthetic human organs they're the best method for testing new medical procedures.