this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
1166 points (98.6% liked)

Greentext

6653 readers
2006 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 244 points 1 day ago (23 children)

Average autism experience tbh

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 180 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That, and teachers really fucking hate being called out on something for some reason.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 80 points 1 day ago (3 children)

All my teachers were fine with it honestly :3 at least after primary school.. if you corrected them they might've given you extra credit

But the general notion of saying something correct and people saying that that's wrong, and not knowing why still stands

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I asked my science teacher why and how the periodic table was setup like it was, I got "that's how it's setup"

But why, there as to be a reason

That's just the way they made it

Yeah because they have to have gone by something what is that something

That's just the way they did, stop asking questions (please don't fucking learn in here)

Godamn that pissed me off.

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Too proud to say "I don't know, I'll look it up and tell you tomorrow".

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 46 minutes ago

Yeah, that wouldve been a great opportunity to get me further interested.

I have never been in a job where "I don't know" is an acceptable answer, but I've always been in a job where "I don't know, but I can find out for you" always is.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Really? We got a detailed breakdown of why the periodic table is the way it is

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, turned me off to science at that age too which sucks because I was pretty into it.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

in case you still care: the periodic table is arranged primarily by the chemical properties of its elements (mainly electronegativity, i.e. how much energy it takes to add/remove an electron to/from the atom) and also by their mass.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I do friend, I ended up looking into a few years later/have other teachers explain it but I never had that spark about it again

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Huh? It's sorted by number of electrons/protons (atomic number) the mass is dependent on that and the number of neutrons.

The eight main groups are based on the number of electrons missing for the atom to reach a full valence shell. Once it is full (8th group, noble gasses) it starts a new Period (row). I'm not sure how the other groups are chosen (probably some quantum physics that I never had in chemistry class). After looking it up Wikipedia says it just keeps going that way.

Electronegativity describes how much it "wants" to attract negative charges and doesn't affect the order (Flourine has the highest and is in group 7). I think you may have confused it with ionization energy which would certainly match my understanding of the top half of the periodic table and probably does work for the lower half too now that I think about it.

The groups tend to have similar properties but that is not why they are sorted that way. Hydrogen for example is quite different from other elements in group one. The colours are probably better for finding common properties.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Have a look through the history section. The concept of periodicity substantially predates the quantisation of the atom. The modern table certainly considers atomic orbitals to be key, but the groups were absolutely created based on common properties.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The table that does it that way is a complete mess but I guess it was a good idea and got some things right.

They first started doing it with valence shells in 1864, Mendeleev had a pretty close one based on atomic weights in 1871 and correctly predicted that there were missing elements based on valences + weights. The atomic numbers which determine the valences appear to have been discovered about 40 years later.

I guess you are correct but I think the question was about the modern table.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Once I got into Gifted teachers were like that. My first couple years in normie classes suuuucked.

Then in Gifted the bullies got much smarter. Fun times.

[–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You had an extraordinary school experience.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 3 points 22 hours ago

Maybe :3 I think my school wasn't that highly ranked nationally, but I don't know how others were in terms of the teachers so can't compare.. It definitely had a lot of other issues tho haha

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago

Teachers and parents. So many tend to double down when you point out their mistakes.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 18 hours ago

All they got in life is their self-declared superiority over literal children

load more comments (19 replies)