this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
79 points (89.9% liked)

science

20232 readers
854 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

let's be honest.

they could have called it complex numbers and it would save the teachers a lot of questions.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you may be unaware of how majestically terrible mathheads are at naming things

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if they were good with words they wouldn't be doing maths

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Feynman was good with both...

Yeah "imaginary" isn't a good name and doesn't convey what they are. No one is learning about imaginary numbers before being familiar with the Cartesian plane, they're literally just another number line perpendicular to the reals. Ironically, one could call them "normal" numbers for that reason. But really any synonym for "perpendicular" would be better than "imaginary". I think "orthogonal numbers" has a nice ring to it.