We appreciate your input and contribution to improving our product. While this feature may have merit, we need to prioritize our efforts elsewhere at this time.

If you'd like to provide additional context about why this feature is important, please feel free to leave a comment on this issue. This will help us better evaluate the feature if we revisit this area in the future.

Thank you for your understanding and continued support in helping us build a better product.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Damn, that's incredibly disappointing...

I use forgejo and it's expected to have federation eventually, but it would've been amazing for gitlab to have AP support. Hopefully in the future it might be picked up again.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It annoys me that we have on one atproto, but there's no fediverse one.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

It's cool af (i don't know much abt atproto, but my friend who knows much more about the technical stuff of fedi/matrix/etc likes it more than AP :shrug:) but i wouldn't trust my sensitive repos with it for now. But i guess its the best we have right now :c

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh noo; forgejo is still not connected? I had high hopes. What's the timeline?

(Honestly, but for the wonky CI spec language I may have switched already)

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure, it hasn't been announced. They're waiting for forgefed to finish being developed until they implement federation