Asklemmy

49218 readers

1035 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

What do you guys think of freedom of speach in 2025s internet? (lemmy.wtf)

submitted 2 days ago by PrincessCory@lemmy.wtf to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/24486673

I think that you are not allowed to speak freely on most platforms. And when i say speak freely i dont mean to have right to offend people, just to have right to normaly tell your opinion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PrincessCory@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So what if one country doesnt agree with one specific internacional law, and doesnt want to respect it?

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it is right but nothing can really stop them.

[–] PrincessCory@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Thats good, because if i didnt agree to laws than they shouldnt be pushed onto me. Laws are something that we should chose, if we dont chose them than who will? Back in the days there were laws that sad black man are for sale so why should i have respact for laws in general? If i personaly didnt approve them..

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The universe and planet itself has it's own rules that we can't change even if we want to so the idea that everybody could choose their own rules no matter how extreme they could be make zero sense to me.

The idea that individuals could pick and choose their own laws regardless of if they make sense or can hurt other would only cause chaos and violence. Of course, not all legislation is good; history teaches us that some legislation, such as laws permitting slavery, was very immoral. That's why societies need mechanisms to challenge and modify unfair legislation.

I think the best system is direct democracy

[–] PrincessCory@lemmy.wtf -1 points 1 day ago

Well its obviosly imposible for every single person to chose their ovn lavs but thats why you should have diferent countries where you can move if you agree to their laws. Like there are diferent states with diferent laws. So if you dont like laws in your state and like laws in another you move there. So people with same ideas have their group and their space. That way we can compare states and see whic one have better laws objectivly. And can copy that in our state. Bushing same laws on everyone is bad idea..