this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
97 points (83.9% liked)
The Right Can't Meme
263 readers
1 users here now
Intro
Hi this is a replica of the subreddit of the same name. Small disclaimer: I never intended to be the creator or moderator here, I just was sick of waiting for someone else to do it. :)
Rules
- Right (or at least non-left) content only. Satire content will likely be removed
- Similar rules for comments. The topic is mocking right wing memes. This is NOT a space for political debate.
- Reposts from other sources are inevitable, however try to avoid reposting content that's already here
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I got nerdsniped by this. If you're in the US in the highest-tax state (California) filing singly with the standard deduction and all of your income was earned, you'd need to make $1,308,404 in 2025 to see an aggregate income tax rate of 40%. This would put you somewhere in the 99.9th percentile of earners.
If you instead make your money through already being rich (long term capital gains and qualified dividends), it's impossible to ever hit 40%.
I feel it’s important to further clarify that California is only a high tax state for the very high bracket earners.
Oh, for sure, it's just the highest one for this particular math problem.
I'm not that familiar with tax law in the USA, why is it impossible? Is it because making money by having money is not taxed, so if it makes up a large enough percentage of your income, the percentage of your total income you pai in taxes can never reach 40%? If so, at which point does it become impossible? (Unless there is a 100% tax bracket, which would be Un-American™)
Capital gains and qualified dividends cap at 20% federally and 12.3% in the state with the highest tax rate, so the tax burden on them can never exceed 32.3% at infinite earnings.
Regular income caps at 37% federally and 12.3% in California, so can get up to 49.3% at infinite earnings.