this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
224 points (81.6% liked)

ADHD

11505 readers
73 users here now

A casual community for people with ADHD

Values:

Acceptance, Openness, Understanding, Equality, Reciprocity.

Rules:

Encouraged:

Relevant Lemmy communities:

Autism

ADHD Memes

Bipolar Disorder

Therapy

Mental Health

Neurodivergent Life Hacks

lemmy.world/c/adhd will happily promote other ND communities as long as said communities demonstrate that they share our values.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
224
Pangolin at Work #1 (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) by Reverendender@sh.itjust.works to c/adhd@lemmy.world
 

EDIT: It’s honestly hard to believe how intense and personal some of the hostility in this thread is. I understand objecting to something when there is a valid concern, especially about ethics or consent. But this is something else entirely. It feels less like people are engaging with the actual work and more like they are reacting to the mere presence of AI in any form, regardless of context.

I don’t think LLMs are universally good or bad. I think they are very very bad at a large number of things, especially when people try to use them as shortcuts in places where care, originality, or expertise (or human understanding and subsequent empathy) are required. But they are also extremely effective in other use cases when used with skill, intention, and thought. That is the position I hold. It is nuanced. It does not dismiss the criticisms people have raised, but it also does not treat every use of the technology as automatically unethical or invalid.

What I did was not a random one-line prompt into a generator. I gave deliberate, specific instructions about pose, anatomy, style, and tone. I gave feedback. I adjusted the inputs. I guided it through a process that produced something unique and original. The result is not a collage of stolen images. It is not a copy of anything that has ever existed. That is important context, and it is constantly ignored in these arguments.

There is a real difference between raising concerns in good faith and launching personal attacks at people who use a tool in a considered way. The people jumping into these threads with moral outrage are not engaging in objective analysis. They are repeating talking points as if AI art is some kind of singular personal enemy. It often feels like they are reacting based on something they heard someone else say, rather than thinking critically about what is in front of them.

And this is happening in a community that is supposed to be supportive of neurodivergent people. That is the part I find most maddening. There is room here for discussion and for disagreement. But instead of debate, we get judgment, condescension, rabid hostility, and attempts to shame people for trying something different. That is not the kind of environment anyone should want to foster.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The upvotes are a pretty clear indicator that most people enjoy it. As usual, it's a few vocal ***** like you who think you're right and want to impose your values on everybody else.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i'm not imposing anything, i think AI are is shite on many levels and i'm vocal about it. die mad about it

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny, you seem to be the one who's mad. I'm just bemused. Also a little annoyed on OP's behalf that his first comic got derailed into this nonsense discussion.

i'm not imposing anything

Says the person with explicit instructions to others on how to approach their own creativity.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

jesus, you're deeply annoying

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because I'm pointing out unpleasant facts? Imagine how OP feels. He made something, posted it for the first time, and the feedback he gets consists of 'You're a horrible person for not doing this the way I think you should'. You're shitting on somebody's first (and possibly only) attempt at doing something cool to push your irrelevant opinions.

What a horribly sad life OP must be living that their greatest claim to fame is a comic that was made for them.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You know, the n-word was pretty popular in 1850.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It still is today in some circles. What's your point? I can pull out random analogies out of my ass too if that's all we're doing.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's good to impose anti n-word values on people. It makes the world better, you know?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

I think so too. How does this relate to the topic at hand?