this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
700 points (98.1% liked)

Political Humor

1242 readers
1449 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You realise you can present historical actions that support your argument without being a complete bellend about it, right?

For example, in 2015 Bernie Sanders was becoming a hot favourite to become the public's new pin-up boy for the 2016 presidential run. Unfortunately for him, it is alleged that the DNC had already banked on Hilary Clinton being the primary winner, so their plan may have had it's legs done before they even started.

So, it is widely reported that the DNC provided very little support to Sanders for the remainder of his campaign run, while pouring big money and organising competing support behind Clinton, stacking the odds in her favour.

In this instance, history tells us that whereas a candidate may be supremely popular, they may not end up getting the support of the political party they represent.

(The above is a massive oversimplification to fit into a bite sized lemmy post, so points of discussion are expected)

[โ€“] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The reality is very few people vote in primaries and, as you've just read in this thread, many don't even know what primaries are.