this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
738 points (97.7% liked)

Aged Like Milk

210 readers
149 users here now

A community dedicated to all those things in media and elsewhere that didn’t stand the test of time, at all.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

didn't the UN find that they were enriching uranium past what was required for nuclear power, which indicates they're enriching it for nuclear weapons? To my knowledge this is the first time in something like 20 years that this has happened

to be clear, fuck israel for this escalation and their horrific genocide. There is no justification even if Iran had a fleet of WMDs.

I'm genuinely not sure how similar Iraq is to this

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Were you too young for Iraq?

It was a bit different, Americans were baying for revenge after 9/11, but also many people were adamantly against going to war.

I think there was less evidence of any WMD, everyone knew it was bullshit, but someone had to pay for 9/11.

In this case, the USA doesn't really give a shit about Iran, nobody has a score to settle, but the killer is - and the thing I remember from last time - is that at the beginning everyone was like cut the bullshit - but as time went along the media convinced a majority it was a good idea.

The same will happen here, they just haven't had a chance to catch up yet.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What did Iraq have to do with 9/11?

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing except that it's in the middle east and is majority Muslim.

That's all the American public needed.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Depressingly accurate I think. It resulted in very large protests that achieved nothing here. I wonder if Iran would lead to even more protesting, or if support will be limited to avoid that.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I was too young. I realize i'm probably splitting hairs. The differences b/w both situations feel large enough that lazily conflating the two feels incorrect, even though they are certainly similar enough to compare.

Trump is somehow a more stupid, meaner W. There's no 9/11 he can use to whip up nationalistic frenzy. Israel has aggressed first & is trying to drag the world into a conflict that's already hugely unpopular. Maybe I'm hoping Middle East War # gazillion evaporates as US interest does. I'm hoping this conflict is dissimilar enough from Iraq to turn out differently, and for us to have learned something in the interceding 20+ years

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but so is North Korea. Plutonium, that is, not uranium, but still. Who cares? Could you imagine if South Korea just randomly started bombing their "nuclear engineers" + civilians and then US piped in?

No because Kim said nice words to Trump and wrote him a love letter.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Totally agree! This situation is unbelievably stupid

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

to be fair time is much older than Iran. But it is weird they've taken 40 years to develop a nuclear weapon when designs have been freely available online for over half that time.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The design isn't the issue, it's obtaining enough enriched material to actually construct it.