this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)

news

24098 readers
905 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VibeCoder@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do they do this because it’s more cost effective or because it scales better or something? Maybe it clears the conscience of the people who would otherwise be doing the killing. Or is the cruelty the point?

[–] WafflesTasteGood@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

While cost efficiency is probably a factor, id lean a lot more to cruelty being the point. Not to justify mass killing of animals here, but theres absolutely better choices than CO2 which causes suffering in basically all oxygen breathing creatures.

[–] BanSwitch2Buyers@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago

It's definitely cost. They don't give a fuck about animals, workers, environment, etc. This is likely deemed cheapest because it's mostly mechanized and requires fewer workers.

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I will tell you that CO2 euthanasia is generally considered a humane method, although in research they tell us that and then also don’t allow its use on anything bigger than a pre-adolescent rat.

I do not like this method, and have always thought it was really weird that it was considered acceptable. Seems like N2 or CO would be much better choices, and aren’t more expensive. But generally CO2 is accepted by animal ethics boards.