this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
85 points (96.7% liked)

Linux

55067 readers
950 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From both a technical perspective and if the maintainers of these anti-cheat will consider porting or re-writing kernel level anti-cheat to work on linux, is it possible? Do you think that the maintainers of kernel level anti-cheat will be adamant in not doing it, or that the kernel even supports it or will support it. I think that if it ever happens, there will be a influx of people moving to linux, or abandoning their duelboots, and that alot of people will hate that such a thing is available on linux.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think its less a question of the technical feasibility, and more of an issue that we, as users, don't want more closed-source blobs in our kernels. Meanwhile, the publishers insist that they can't open-source their anti-cheat code; Their idea being that if we know what's in it, it will be easier to bypass.

Basically, one distro or a few(at most) may get anti-cheat integrated one day(like, say, SteamOS), but it will likely never be in your standard Linux kernal.

They could go the rought of kernel modules, I would think, but for whatever reason, we're still having this conversation.

[–] unprovenbreeze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Basically, one distro or a few(at most) may get anti-cheat integrated one day(like, say, SteamOS), but it will likely never be in your standard Linux kernal.

Valve also has server side anticheat in his games (Counter Strike or Deadlock). They are also against it.

Kernel-level anticheats can be bypassed anyways, but they are the easy solution for the corps that want to sell their multiplayer game.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@MachineFab812 @SpiderUnderUrBed even if you have steamOS, what keeps you from downloading kernels from kernel.org and building?

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If you want it to still be steam OS and compatible with games then you couldn't use kernel.org kernels that's the point.

Fundamentally it becomes a console not a PC. That's WHAT steamOS would be in this hypothetical.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

If you want it to still be steam OS and compatible with games then you couldn’t use kernel.org kernels that’s the point.

If a person stands to make a lot of money figuring out how to use a regular, non-anticheat kernel then they will do it. It would be a lot less difficult to do when the kernel code is open source.

For anti-cheats, it isn't the case, as with Windows, where you can semi-trust that the kernel isn't lying. If an anti-cheat runs and wants to see what DMA devices are connected it uses the kernel to do that and it trusts that the kernel isn't lying. You could trivially modify the Linux kernel's source code to not list a specific card when asked by a kernel module.

[–] phantomwise@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

Shite is still shite, even if it's open source shite.