this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
27 points (90.9% liked)

Ask

696 readers
108 users here now

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Posts must be legitimate questions (no rage bait or sea lioning)
  3. No spam
  4. NSFW allowed if tagged
  5. No politics
  6. For support questions, please go to !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca

Icon by Hilmy Abiyyu A.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HoChiMint@hexbear.net 8 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

The semi-rural property I live on (low rent) burnt down so I had to evacuate. But I came back because the building I was in was mostly unharmed somehow. That was a few years ago now so it's been a good amount of time for life to rebound from the fires, but everything has deeply changed since then. It used to be quite lush with green plant life everywhere even in the Summer and Fall. A lot of plants have come back, as expected, but not the lush green foliage, it's all dry grasses and invasive weeds now. It's like living in a completely different biome to what it used to be like here. There used to be a sheen of moisture on everything, now it's a patina of dust.

It's SO much more dry and barren so inevitably the animal life completely changed too. As an example, we used to get these big banana slugs. It may sound gross to some, but they were really fascinating and colorful creatures. I haven't seen one for years, even before the fires it was drying out and they couldn't survive. Now if you brought one from somewhere else and set it here, it would be dead and desiccated within hours. The kinds of insects you could find has completely changed too. Not just in the types, but in a lack of diversity. There used to be this huge variety of beetles and crickets, centipedes, silkworms, butterflies and moths. Now those are mostly all gone and only the earwigs dominate. There are still moths, but only like 2 kinds instead of 20. I try to keep a little garden, and I've noticed there are even fewer earthworms than there used to be. It's sad. It genuinely feels like some kind of slow death in a way.

[–] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Climate change is def causing some of what you're observing but its mostly this:

[–] HoChiMint@hexbear.net 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No, your "mostly this" is climate change too. I'm taking the normal recovery from fire into account for one, and for another, much of these changes I'm talking about happened before the fire (like I mentioned with the banana slugs) which is also a big part of the reason why the fire was more damaging. These are feedback loops with one another, not separate things. For instance, there were fires that came through here in past decades and it didn't happen like this. 25 years ago there was a fire that burned through a coastal park reserve about a 40 minute drive away from where I live. I visited it often both before and especially after that fire, I watched the sequence of different kinds of life year after year. There are even certain kind of trees there whose cones ONLY release their genetic material for reproduction when there's a fire. Whatever area your graphic is from, it's not the area I'm in which has fires more often than every 150 years. What I was trying to get across in my comment above is that the recovery after the fire is totally different now and that is due to climate change. Also the intensity of the fire itself was much more than past fires and that is due to climate change.

[–] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 3 points 6 hours ago

the image i linked is an example of secondary succession. it isn't meant to represent any particular area. if your area only has fires every couple of decades or so then that's what you're seeing