this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
17 points (77.4% liked)

Weight Talk: Fitness, Health and Society

52 readers
2 users here now

Discussion community about how weight is socialized, what weights are scientifically healthy, and what fitness really looks like for all genders.

founded 3 days ago
MODERATORS
 

As I understand it, the current medical consensus is that fat protects muscle, and has health benefits when it is in moderation, but increases risks for bad outcomes when in excess. And muscle weighs more than fat, and aside from heart disease, generally protects against death of all causes. If muscle is generally good, and fat is good in moderation, why do we still popularly conflate skinniness as healthiness?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

BMI is used two ways; as a population tool to compare groups of people, and as a screening tool for indviduals to see if more detailed tests need to be run. I've given other examples of screening tests here - the sit/stand test and an alcohol screener. None of these form the basis of clinical recommendations. A positive finding is cause to ask further questions. "Oh you're very tall ok BMI doesn't work well then." Or "Oh you're muscular, that's fine".

As a personal example I was a serious runner at one point in my life and my resting heart rate slipped below 40 at the doctor's office. It set off an alarm. I confirmed that I ran about 70 miles a week and we all had a laugh about it.

The fact that you know some edge cases doesn't invalidate the measure. And let me point out that people have an amazingly distorted view of normal now. A 6'0" man weighing 225 lbs is obese. 225 seems like a typical weight but from a historical view that is very large. The fact that most of the North American population is overweight or obese and they don't like to hear that.