this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
929 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

69946 readers
2258 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
929
Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
313 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So do you target AI training explicitly?

No. Same rules as everyone else.

How can that he even enforced?

Disclosure of training sources

Is my review sentiment evaluation machine illegal now?

If your sources are copyrighted, yes.

What if I RAG copyrighted content in am I in jail now?

Unlikely. None payment of restitution in a civil case could end in jail via contempt of court.

How could this possible be ever enforced?

The same way other copyright claims are enforced.

This issue is dominated by tech illiterate

Literacy in technology has no effect on the law.

fall for copyright propaganda.

We're had many years of publishing strengthening their legal position. It's case law, not propaganda.