this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
172 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

37737 readers
9 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shira Anderson, an American international rights lawyer, is Meta’s AI policy chief who voluntarily enlisted for the IDF in 2009 under a program which enables non-Israeli Jews who aren’t eligible for military conscription to join the Israeli army.

With AI a critical emerging technology for tech giants and militaries, Anderson’s role at Meta is an important one. She develops the legal guidance, policies and public relations talking points concerning AI issues and regulation for all of Meta’s key areas, including its product, public policy and government affairs teams.

At Meta, Anderson, who is based in Meta’s Washington DC office, is in familiar company. More than one hundred former Israeli spies and IDF soldiers are employed by the company, my new investigation shows, many of whom worked for Israel’s spy agency Unit 8200.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's very clear sometimes who wants suffering and who actually wants peace.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ok? Don't quite know how this relates to my comment about legislation behind armed conflict and the definition of "civilian" though. Did you respond to the wrong person?

[–] lud@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm on your side mate.

I'm equally annoyed when people want civilians to die no matter who.

Ah, alright then. I didn't really understand what your comment was referring to at first.