this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
254 points (99.6% liked)

World News

1040 readers
518 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] egrets@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Apparently it was an arbitrary extra 50% on top of the recent 54%, which was the supposed trade deficit plus existing tariffs. I'm not saying it's not batshit, but the new figure wasn't a totally random specific number.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So isn't only somewhere around 72 percent from original?

[–] Pofski@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Now you're asking them to do correct calculations?