this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
55 points (95.1% liked)
Casual Conversation
3132 readers
160 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Used to like it, but it faded over time, mostly due to the car being far beyond its prime. Not that I minded driving an old car, but I could no longer assume that it'd last the entire trip without trouble.
Then a little over a week ago I bought a new (to me) car. And that's when I noticed what I'd been missing for the past few years: I'd started to enjoy driving again.
Another factor was that once upon a time everything I owner could fit into my 1996 Volvo 940. And I took advantages of this a few times by moving across Europe. Later I became a family man, so that wasn't the case anymore, but it was OK: The entire household could fit in the car with a lot of luggage space as well.
Around the time when the old car symptoms really started to show up more and more frequently, we got a surprise 6th family member, and traveling anywhere now involved a lot of planning and usually sticking the oldest kid on an airplane or coordinating with someone else driving the same route.
But my new car (2019 Volvo XC90) can fit everyone, so now we can just hop in the car and go. So come summer I think we're just gonna go on a road trip down through Europe for the first time in 15 years.