This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.
☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory reading group has moved to Lemmygrad - see the pinned posts
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive, libgen
I loathe that term too. It makes no sense grammatically. "Content" of what? This is not a word that is supposed to be used on its own, it's a word to specify that something is contained within something else. As in, the contents of a box, a bag, a letter, etc. The use of the term "content" as a standalone word is an awful corporate-speak neologism. It's also way too broad in its current use, it can literally mean anything posted on the internet. It's stupid and i hate it.
Yeah! I don't know why the vaguest possible word caught on. Now it's just a formal way of saying "things." If you care so little about what you're creating that you can't even describe it, just call it what it is: slop. Ugh it's so frustrating how the most disinterested business jargon imaginable is the new normal. It's one thing for shareholders to describe their cash cows as "stuff makers" because of course they would. But why on earth are people choosing to call themselves that instead of, idk, photographers, video editors, writers, artists?