this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
482 points (86.9% liked)

PC Master Race

15615 readers
357 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Ironically, if they were analog wireless, thered be no latency at all

[–] Saganastic@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So basically radio? It would still be limited by the speed of light, you would have nanoseconds (or microseconds?) of latency!

[–] Pizzasgood@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ten nanoseconds of travel time for every three meters of distance, or roughly one nanosecond per foot.

[–] nabladabla@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Wired head phones are also limited by the speed of light

Even cable has latency...

[–] Neve8028@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

You have a pretty noticeable fidelity drop when going over radio waves, though. Any pro audio devices like wireless microphones or IEMs will go over radio waves, though. Works fine for on stage use but isn't ideal in other settings.