this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
466 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
4730 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China has released a set of guidelines on labeling internet content that is generated or composed by artificial intelligence (AI) technology, which are set to take effect on Sept. 1.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Exec@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a different thing. C2PA is proving a photo is came from a real camera, with all the editing trails. All in a cryptographic manner. This in the topic is trying to prove what not real is not real, by self claiming. You can add the watermark, remove it, add another watermark of another AI, or whatever you want. You can just forge it outright because I didn't see cryptographic proof like a digital sign is required.

Btw, the C2PA data can be stripped if you know how, just like any watermarks and digital signatures.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stripping C2PA simply removes the reliability part, which is fine if you don't need it. It is something that is effective when present and not when it isn't.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's never effective. At best, you could make the argument that a certain person lacks the wherewithal to have manipulated a signature, or gotten someone else to do it. One has to hope that the marketing BS does not convince courts to assign undue weight to forged evidence.