LOL
The horrible feodal system with serfs/slaves the Tibetans has was sooo much better.
Some CIA poking didn't work to bring that back.
And there was a small minority radicalised terrorists by Turkey and OC again the CIA to cause trouble, which they did.
blew up a plane with civilians, multiple other attacks on busses, trainstations, etc....
The majority never liked them and are glad it's over.
But nice try.

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 hours ago

Im sure they love making iphones until they jump off a roof

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Not sure what you're trying to say. Uyghurs are systematically eradicated and tibet is controlled by china since their invasion in the 1950s. Not exactly speaking in favor of communism.

So, if you'd like to expand on your point, I might be able to discuss this further.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

eradicated LOL, their population is growing, despite the many some US backed terrorist killed.
And Tibet doesn't have slaves anymore who literally had chains around their necks suffering under the religious buddhist monks terror.
Yawn, can you bring up Tiananmen square again to not be original? I'll wait

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

eradicated LOL, their population is growing

According to who? The chinese government? Lmao. Ye I would DEFINITELY trust the ones that are performing the killings on reporting accurate numbers.

And Tibet doesn’t have slaves anymore who literally had chains around their necks suffering under the religious buddhist monks terror.

Imperialism good when country does bad things?

Yawn, can you bring up Tiananmen square again to not be original? I’ll wait

I could, but if you want some originality, I can also bring up one of the other atrocities directly ordered by communist regimes, like the Prague Spring, Hungarian Revolution or the mass executions by the Khmer in Cambodia.

[–] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

oh, the khmer rouge, that one that the u.s. supported along with britain, china (not so dirty back then, right) and who were toppled by the socialist regime of vietnam?

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 hour ago

I already answered that to someone else so I'll just copy and paste it:

The US never directly supported pol pot. Before 1975, they supported Lon Nol, who was fighting against the communist Khmer Rouge.

The part that IS true is that the US did support China and Thailand at the time, which in turn used that aid to support resistance groups in cambodia because vietnam invaded cambodia in 1979 - something the US had no problem with since vietnam was backed by the soviets. Also, it is true that the US and other western countries supported keeping the Khmer Rouge as Cambodia’s official UN representative, however, that was mostly done to undermine Vietnam’s rule over cambodia.

So, yes, by extension, the US supported pol pot, but it’s not the big “gotcha” you think it is - it was the cold war, an extremely complex geopolitical time.

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Lol I meant to reply to the main thread, but you could pretend im being sarcastic and it kinda works

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 hour ago

Makes sense, I just was kinda confused and wasn't sure.