this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)

Fairvote Canada

465 readers
253 users here now

Matrix Chat


What is This Group is About?

De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?


The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.

🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.


Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.

🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.




Related Communities/Communautés Associées

Resources/Ressources

Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles



We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.


Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.


founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Fair Vote Canada on Bluesky

Proportional representation doesn’t just change how many seats a party wins, but where.

Whether you're a Liberal in rural Alberta or a Conservative in downtown Toronto, you get the representation you vote for.

That's why we love PR-it bridges our divides.

#cdnpoli

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Please refrain from using curse words, it distracts from the substance of your comment.
  2. The government is able to focus on multiple priorities at the same time. While threats of another country annexing us are high priority, it doesn't help us that the democratic legitimacy of our government aren't as strong as they could be.
  3. And how would proportional representation cause us to not have a country? I would say that a minority governing on behalf of the majority, like it is now under FPTP, is ripping the fabric of our country apart.
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Stopped reading at condescension.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Disagreement is not condescension.