this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
184 points (98.9% liked)

Cybersecurity

6571 readers
19 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Am I misunderstanding the article? It seemed to imply remote intrusion required either Bluetooth proximity, or physical USB access.

[–] Fermiverse@gehirneimer.de 13 points 1 day ago

Correct, but as bluetooth is possible over a certain range, "drive by attacks" might be possible.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

The "attack" is from the host side, any remote attack is theoretical and would depend on exploiting the software on the host first to then gain access to the BT chip.