this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
170 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

64653 readers
4282 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
170
Milestone: NASA achieved GPS signals on Moon (www.techexplorist.com)
submitted 3 days ago by empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Their achieved accuracy was +/- 1.5km and +/- 2m/s

Which is an improvement in of itself. That improves flying craft navigation to and from the moon into something significantly easier to automate and coordinate between multiple ships, more than ballistic dead reckoning.

[–] britaliope@kourjetez.bzh 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

is it really such a huge deal ? Afaik "ballistic dead rekoning" is really, really accurate and isnt difficult to automate (it's mostly math after all)

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

For longer missions it helps to be able to re-calibrate, as with dead-reckoning, the errors cumulate