this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
724 points (98.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

4642 readers
1194 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Joe Exotic posts on instagram that his husband was deported by ICE after years of shilling for Donald Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Marriage has nothing to do with relationships or love. Never has and never will. Marriage is a contract, whether the terms of that contract is who has power of attorney by default or a mutual defense pact against the Ottoman Empire is up to the betrothed.

Let me provide an example of why this has to be in place: One cannot be compelled to testify against a spouse in court. That protection doesn't extend to boyfriends, fucktoys or high-speed-low-passes. To prevent that system from being abused, you're going to need to have a registry somewhere otherwise every court case is going to be "the prosecution can't call any witnesses because everyone in the English speaking world is my spouse."

Boyfriend, partner, dicksheath, cumdumpster, codpiece, anklegrabber, better half or significant other, these terms have no legal meaning and thus are perfectly free to use. "Husband" "Wife" and "Spouse" mean "we are parties of a certain standardized, legally binding contract."

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Ain't nobody should have to snitch to the cops about nothing if they don't want to. Shouldn't require marriage at all.

Also, if marriage isn't about love, then how come you can't marry your sister? I'm not advocating for sister marriage, I'm just pointing out it definitely is about love, and that's why marrying your sister is weird.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think what they were saying is that “marriage” is a legally defined union between two people. A 12 year old child bride will be married - but I wouldn’t have thought love comes into that kind of horrific union.

There’s plenty of people who are not married but are in love with their partner and there are plenty of married couples where the love died long ago; if it even ever existed.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Well that's wrong. Spouses should love each other. The law shouldn't keep them together if they don't. Abolish legal marriage.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 37 minutes ago

Yeah - a loveless marriage is possibly the saddest place you could ever be. Don’t do it to yourself. (which, admittedly, you seem unlikely to.)

Whilst, yes, abolishing marriage might be a good idea there are certain legal and tax advantages to being married (in some jurisdictions). These would need to be worked out to apply equally to all couples (thrupples, polygamous communes, multi-wife faiths etc.) but wouldn’t be impossible.