this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
345 points (97.5% liked)

Buy European

947 readers
1540 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

European Alternatives

Related Communities:

Buy Local:

!buyfromeu@feddit.org

!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyafrican@baraza.africa

Buying and Selling:

!flohmarkt@lemmy.ca

Boycott:

!boycottus@lemmy.ca

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Version 2 of the European app alternatives. Feel free to share it :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Yep, as it doesn't have a monetization incentive it will be never that appealing. There should be a way for authors to earn money.

It’s not about monetisation. It’s about audience. Who is going to bother to host an instance and post to a platform where the most popular videos only get 100 views?

[–] nico198X@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

monetizing life led to the shittiness. don't do it again.

[–] Snoezelpoes 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's true that the monetisation of everything is pretty awful, but it's one of the most important reasons to join a platform for content creators whether we like it or not.

The main reason to join a platform for a creator is the amount of the potential viewers, which of course don't increase much without new content creators. Therefore Peertube needs a secondary reason for creators to join, which it doesn't seem to have.

If anything, joining Peertube will in theory decrease their income, which actually gives them a reason to not join :(

[–] nico198X@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago

at this point in my life, i just can't care about catering once again to capitalism. i'm basically out of that game and encourages others to do the same.

youtube worked because it was fun to make videos for each other as a community. that's what peertube brings back and i prefer it that way rather than the attention-addicted sickness it has become.

[–] SeboBear@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 14 hours ago

Can not agree more. When I open YouTube and see the amount of clickbait previews, badly cut and created content and just copies left n right I loose all interest

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Monetizing leads to being able to pay bills. Don't you think authors deserve being paid for the content if they wish so? Besides Google managing of youtube is cause of shittiness. Personally I would be fine with a subscription as long as artists get most of it.

[–] nico198X@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

it doesn't need to be built in. there's already a section to add Support links.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nico198X@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

just external links to donate sites, patreons, Kofi, etc.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that does not and will not work, at least not on scale. Think about an average user - do you think he/she will donate to each video he/she watches, perhaps on TV? But if the model is a subscription one (think Netflix, Tidal, Spotify, heck, perhaps even YouTube and so on, with amount being fairly distributed to authors), then it just might work.

[–] nico198X@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

cool, good luck with that. i'm happy the way it is.