this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
861 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

9629 readers
906 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unless people vote with their wallets against AI slop, then it would be always a controversial choice whether to even employ AI.

Probably too utopian

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

AI slop

That's not what this does though.

To me, AI slop is people generating entire fake websites full of SEO terms but no information. Or people using AI tools to repost popular YouTube content. Completely worthless content that only exists to fool people.

Steam's filter removed any game that reports using generative models at all.

That's simply not useful unless your idea of AI slop is "someone used AI".

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 21 hours ago

Exactly what I wanted to say, not sure why I got upvoted there lol

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

AI content already appears to be at the point where it's absence is considered positive.