this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
24 points (96.2% liked)

Geopolitics

386 readers
23 users here now

The study of how factors such as geography, economics, military capability and non-State actors affects the foreign policy of states.

All articles will require a short submission statement of 3-5 sentences.

Use the article title as the submission title. Do not editorialize the title or add your own commentary to the article title.

In this community we encourage long, in-depth submissions. Submissions should not be news articles that merely provide quick updates on current events; instead they should include background information and an explanation as to why the events they describe are occurring.

Submissions should not be about an individual country's domestic policies. Instead, they should be about relationships between different countries and/or relevant international organizations. Things like breakaway politics are permitted in this subreddit, as they are relevant to and could affect the geopolitical system.

Submissions are strongly encouraged to come from reputable sources. When posting from a lesser known source, please check whether the authors have some sort of qualification demonstrating they are knowledgeable of the subjects they discuss.

Sources that include (or solely contain) maps, statistics, or other multimedia (videos, interviews, primary sources, etc.) are permitted and even encouraged in this subreddit.

We encourage discussion and welcome anyone to pose hypotheses and ask questions. We allow self-posts.

We encourage comments to be cited.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm aware of how short-sighted and unstable the U.S. is, but bipartisan goals in this country can survive years and years of "leadership changes" is my concern.

The U.S. instability and division can actually somewhat frustratingly work it it's favor, by keeping the masses distracted and angry and divided and fearful, further cementing the rule of the capitalists and imperial hegemony, and cause people to become even further supporters of Amerikkkan imperialism.

My concern is that Russia turning on China, while being an unlikely possibility, is way above a remote possibility. If I had to guess, maybe it's a 1.5-10 or 20 percent. Even 1.5 percent is too high for my tastes.

I think that fortunately, Russia has very little reason to turn towards the west, and that even the lifting of sanctions or being allowed back into SWIFT isn't nearly enough to persuade Russia back. It would take multiple acts of god for Russia to even slightly turn back to the west, let alone distance itself from, let alone betray China.

Alot of times in politics and probability and thought, it's not the very likely and very unlikely things that concern me. It's the unlikely things. Even a 1 or two percent chance can end up feeling more like 30 percent.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Exactly, it's not so much that Russia is loyal to China but rather that the west has precious little to offer. I do think that this sort of political variability is more prevalent in the west however. Russian and Chinese politics are much more stable in nature, and hence there tends to be a lot less surprise upsets of the sort we see in the west.

[–] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would argue that Russia does have a sense of loyalty to China, but it's not as rock solid as it should be IMO.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Russia tends to be fairly good at keeping their commitments in general. So, I can't really see them stabbing China in the back here.